Every
BMW owner knows BMW Scanner series, especially BMW Scanner 1.4.0 car diagnostic
tool for its low cost and high efficiency, do all kind of stuff including very
easy coding. Here I would like to make a comparison between the three popular devices,
they are BMW Scanner 1.4.0, BMW Scanner 2.0.1 and BMW Scanner 2.20 K+Dcan.
Vehicle models
they support:
I
know 1.4.0 supports models:
E38
(7')
E39
(5')
E46
(3')
E53
(X5)
E83
(X3)
E85
(Z4)
and
2.0.1 supports:
E60/E61(5')
E63/E64(6')
E65-E68(7')
E70/E71(X5/X6)
E81/E82/E87/E88(1')
E90-E93(3')
BMW Scanner 2.20
k+Dcan
supports the same models, or it support more earlier moddels like 1.4.0. and
that is the difference between 2.0.1 versus 2.20 k+Dcan in function range, coding
ant etc. 2.20 k+Dcan to work on newer models need to remove pin 8 from obd
connector,
Some
info got that here is the quote from a BMW thread:
"Since
2006/03, BMW use" Dcan", means that diagnosis use no KL15, so as GT1,
need to change the OBDII cable.
The
old OBDII cable cannot use on cars which was assembled after 2006/03.
And
Since SOP 2008/09, you must remove pin 8 then you can do everything."
Coding:
When
I first used BMW Scanner 1.4 I fell in love from first time use until i started
using more and more and i got disappointed with it (Incorrect Index)
When
I first used Scanner 2.xx I always keep in Mind CAS - Bricking
When
I first Used INPA-Suit i used DIS along with Progman..... Until i bought a Car
just too learn how to code with INPA-Suit since CarSoft BMW messed up during
Service Reset, and after a Week of Loading, translating, reading, trying I
learned.... after few more cars I learned been faster.
Conclusion:
1.4
is VARY SIMPLE
2.x
VARY Complicated
Both
of them are limited.
Hope
this helps.
没有评论:
发表评论